|
1
|
- Marty Lavin, Tim Williams,
- Jeff Mouat
|
|
2
|
- High volume periods, then peaks followed by a crash
- During crash better lending and better types of loans
- more loans with real estate
- more loans on private property
- many fewer loans in communities result
- much higher credit with better execution
|
|
3
|
- 1960’s and 1970’s – till ’73
- Virtually every bank involved (52% of all new housing starts)
- Then crash, and GECC and S & L’s till late 1980’s
- Then crash, and ABS markets start in 1987
- Crash and no new source in sight for money
- Who will be next? (125,000 annual
shipments now)
|
|
4
|
- Tremendous liquidity and clout
- Know how to really study problem
- Very adverse to losses, already lost their naivete, and won’t reenter
without changes
- (Conseco bonds handled that)
|
|
5
|
- Tremendous losses
- Now know the facts and learning more
- Less risk adverse than GSE’s, but will want similar protections, still
perceive many problems
- Probably will partner with GSE’s, which would provide substantial
increased liquidity
- Both have lost their MH naivete
|
|
6
|
- Home depreciation greatest in communities
- Highest percentage of total repos are in communities and greatest
severity
- Lenders and community owners have not always been friends in downturns
or defaults
- Today lenders highly wary of in-community loans
- I estimate 100,000 – 125,000 homes of in-community chattel loans not
being done at present
|
|
7
|
- High gross – low volume sales model industry standard
- Comunities as a housing option in given markets
- Leasehold rents pricing policies in communities
- Know the rules for pricing your rents
- what is your competition? Apts
and other housing, other community rents
- mortgage payment needs, or replacement costs may be inadequate measures
for community owners
- vacancies mean something
|
|
8
|
- CAS – Community Attribute System
- Invoice database, IBTS
- MHI database
- Shorter repayment term.
- Reduced gross profit at sale
- Better installation performance
- Better and longer home warranties *
- Greater resident lease protection
- MSRP
- Forming much better resale network
- TIPS
- LBP
- MARI
- Community Owners/Lenders Agreement
|
|
9
|
- 21st Mortgage Programs and Comments – Tim Williams
|
|
10
|
- Origen Financial Programs and Comments – Jeff Mouat
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- 9/1995 - 21st begin with 4
employees
- 9/1998 - Tighter underwriting EVA
- 6/2000 - Buyout AHS/CMH 50% investor
- 12/2001 - Buy Assoc. portfolio
- 9/2003 - BRK buys Clayton
- 12/2003 - Clayton buys 21st mortgage
|
|
14
|
- Access
- Associates
- BankAmerica
- Belgravia
- Bombardier
- Burgin
- Chase
- CIT
|
|
15
|
- Differentiation among score ranges
- Importance of Equity
- Repossession loss curve
- Significance of home location
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
- Community incentives reduce equity
- Premature decline in housing Value
- Value determined by total housing cost
- Home payment + site rent
- Relative to alternatives
- Alternatives = Apartments, site built and other communities
|
|
26
|
- Assume site rent at inception
= $300
- $35,000 home 5% down
= $385
- Total housing payment
= $685
- Alternative site built @ 6%
= $114,000
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
- Can’t sell?
- Pay higher rent on home with $10,000 less value
- Pride of ownership declines
- Real depreciation becomes evident
- Customers are trapped
- Only exit is Repossession
|
|
29
|
- Limit exposure to only high equity customers and best credit customers
- Customize plans for certain communities
- Differentiation among communities
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
- Completed $64MM IPO in May ’04
- Completed $150MM 144A equity raise and converted to a Mortgage REIT in
October ’03; followed by an additional $10MM private placement in Feb
’04
- Maintained servicing portfolio of approx. $1.3B, while originating
almost $410MM since January
- Selected as 1 of 9 lenders from Fannie Mae MH Initiative
- Received the MHI 2004 Lender of Year Award
|
|
32
|
- Home Only (93.64%)
- Land Home (6.36%)
- Comparable Appraisal (16.63%)
- Buy For Program (6.04%)
- Secondary Homes (2.78%)
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
- Community Attribute System
- Attributes have a 1 to 5 weight
- Separated Into Three Major Categories
- Management/ Infrastructure/ Economic Attributes
- Community Features/ Amenity Attributes
- Home Activity/ Resale Market Attributes
|
|
40
|
- Lot Lease History
- Vacancy Rate
- Rent Control
- Local Attributes (schools, shopping, location, etc…)
- County Unemployment
- Comparable Apartments
|
|
41
|
- Community Appearance
- Age of Homes
- Types of homes
- Community Amenities
|
|
42
|
- Average Selling Price (new and used)
- Frequency of Repossessions
- Days on Market
- Resale Market
|
|
43
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
- Agreement between Community Owner and Lender that explains who is
responsible for what in the event of a repossession
|
|
47
|
- Lender doesn’t pay back lot rent
- Lender is allowed 12 months to resale home in community without paying rent if the
community has a vacancy greater than 5%
- Lender must bring home up to community standards within 60 days
- If home is to be sold wholesale, Lender shall negotiate exclusively with
Community Operator for the sale of the Home for 30 days
|
|
48
|
|